Titlebook: Causality, Method, and Modality; Essays in Honor of J Gordon G. Brittan (Regents Professor of Philosophy Book 1991 Springer Science+Busines

ARENA

禁止,切斷

Algebra, Constructibility, and the Indeterminate,y fail to bring out their full sophistication. The main figures of the 17th and 18th centuries simply knew a great deal more about mathematics and the various sciences than do the majority of their present commentators.

大溝

,Kant’s “Platonic” Argument in Behalf of the a Priori Character of the Representation of Space,se of the threat which non-Euclidean geometries pose to it and because of the interest which for this reason philosophies of mathematics sometimes have in it. Gottfried Martin has given a little more spice to the arguments of the metaphysical exposition in behalf of the . character of the representa

歡騰

farewell

,Méthode Axiomatique et Idée de Système Dans L’oeuvre de Jules Vuillemin,LEMIN. Soit qu’il s’attache à mettre en évidence ou à restaurer la structure axiomatique d’une théorie scientifique, comme il le fait des 1963 dans “.”; soit qu’il veuille mettre à l’épreuve une doctrine philosophique en en explicitant les présupposés, la conjonction des deux thémes para?t être l’un

吹牛需要藝術(shù)

Algebra, Constructibility, and the Indeterminate,o in important ways with on-going developments in mathematics and the various sciences without also having some knowledge of those developments. Lacking this sort of historical, although at times rather technical, knowledge, commentators often miss the point of the texts. Perhaps more important, the

MUT

On Whether an Answer to a Why-Question is an Explanation if and Only if it Yields Scientific Unders most regard the expression merely as an honorific synonym for the expression “scientific explanation.” And this surely often is the case. There is no loss of meaning, for instance, when the expression “scientific explanation” is substituted for the expression “scientific understanding” in the remar

閑聊

Some Revisionary Proposals About Belief and Believing,er, and an object or set of objects as given in the grammatical form of the sentence, ’x believes that S’; (2) beliefs, whatever they are, can be acquired, replaced, or abandoned; (3) they enter along with desires, needs, wants and other particular circumstances into an explanation of action; and (4

蕨類

Gordon G. Brittan (Regents Professor of Philosophy

艦旗

Online-Marketing in deutschen UnternehmenBut on what basis was Leibniz able to claim that he had founded a science of dynamics? One factor in the answer to this question emerges from a more careful examination of the appeals to the a priori method of demonstration which appear progressively in his unpublished work and in certain exchanges