Titlebook: Causality in Policy Studies; a Pluralist Toolbox Alessia Damonte,Fedra Negri Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author

萬圣節(jié)

書目名稱Causality in Policy Studies影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Causality in Policy Studies影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Causality in Policy Studies網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Causality in Policy Studies網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Causality in Policy Studies被引頻次




書目名稱Causality in Policy Studies被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Causality in Policy Studies年度引用




書目名稱Causality in Policy Studies年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Causality in Policy Studies讀者反饋




書目名稱Causality in Policy Studies讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

得罪

燦爛

incision

Introduction: The Elephant of Causation and the Blind Sages,d almost every discipline has its own. Researchers are like the blind sages who had never come across the elephant of causation before and who develop their idea of the elephant by “touching” a different part of it. Which part of the elephant will you happen to touch? Will you be able to listen to and understand what the other sages will tell you?

太空

Conclusions. Causality Between Plurality and Unity,a plurality of objects and “incommensurable” interpretations. It also argues that the same evidence pinpoints how this plurality is complementary at every level, and causal structures raise as the elements that link ontology and methodology and can organize heterogeneous findings to improve learning across accounts.

expdient

Causation in the Social Realm,tecedents to consequents are less exact than those linking gas leaks to explosions. It is, therefore, a crucial challenge for the philosophy of social science to give a compelling account of causal reasoning about social phenomena that does justice to the research problems faced by social scientists.

expdient

Getting the Most Out of Surveys: Multilevel Regression and Poststratification,ing public opinion estimates to account for observed imbalances between the survey sample and population of interest. It covers the history of MRP, recent advances, an example analysis with code, and concludes with a discussion of best practices and limitations of the approach.

uncertain

人類

失望昨天

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-02811-6chniques, smart statistical tools for reducing imbalance in the empirical distribution of pretreatment covariates between the treatment and control groups. Lastly, it provides an empirical illustration by focusing on two powerful algorithms: the entropy balancing (EB) and the coarsened exact matching (CEM). The chapter ends with caveats.