Titlebook: Cantonese Particles and Affixal Quantification; Peppina Po-lun Lee Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 Affixal quanti

painkillers

Concluding Remarks,he quantificational meaning of the sentence in question is derived. Therefore, I have instead argued that -., -. and -. are quantifiers, performing generic, universal and additive quantification, respectively.

預(yù)測(cè)

小鹿

Hend A. Hadi,Loay E. George,Enas Kh. Hassanuoddy and Northern Sotho have been given in Evans (1995), Jelinek (1995), Bruening (2008), and Zerbian and Krifka (2008), respectively and it is found that A-quantifiers might surface as verbal affixes, incorporated roots, preverbs, auxiliary verbs, as well as independent adverbs and PPs. Some of their examples are given below for illustration.

palpitate

Encumber

Introduction,uoddy and Northern Sotho have been given in Evans (1995), Jelinek (1995), Bruening (2008), and Zerbian and Krifka (2008), respectively and it is found that A-quantifiers might surface as verbal affixes, incorporated roots, preverbs, auxiliary verbs, as well as independent adverbs and PPs. Some of their examples are given below for illustration.

Cumbersome

The Quantification Accessibility Hierarchy for Affixal Quantifiers, they can interpret with all verbal arguments. These suffixes are essentially quantificational, since it is from the suffix that the quantificational meaning of the sentence in question is derived. Hence, any analyses which aim to adequately capture the semantics of these verbal suffixes must account for their quantificational meaning.

茁壯成長(zhǎng)

intelligible

Ethics

Previous Analyses on Quantification and Cantonese Verbal Suffixes, 1974; Barwise and Cooper 1981), with the semantics of universal and existential noun phrases defined in terms of set theory. Second, it is Partee’s twofold classification of D- and A-quantifications, with A-quantifiers further divided into true A-quantifiers along the line of Lewis and Heim and lex

moribund

The Quantification Accessibility Hierarchy for Affixal Quantifiers,marker -., imperfective marker -. and progressive marker -., which are generally considered to be falling under the aspectual group. However, the problem is even if it is correct to claim for their non-aspectual nature, the basic semantics of -., -. and -. remains unknown. As discussed in ., despite