Titlebook: Can Regulation Work?: The Implementation of the 1972 California Coastal Initiative; Paul A. Sabatier,Daniel A. Mazmanian Book 1983 Plenum

供過(guò)于求

Interregnum

Painstaking

北京人起源

多嘴

Therapie der einzelnen Krankheitsbilder,ermit area. Nevertheless, there was a wide range of external forces that would affect their decisions. We now turn to a brief sketch of these forces, beginning with the pressures created by the changing needs and resources of the state’s population, public opinion, and media attention. Then examined

好忠告人

oxidant

Therapie der einzelnen Krankheitsbilder, the attitudes and interaction of commissioners and staff at the regional and state level. This chapter takes the analysis one important step further by focusing on two crucial questions: First, to what extent were the permit decisions of the coastal commissions in fact consistent with statutory obj

反復(fù)無(wú)常

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56398-0isting dwellings to substantial new commercial complexes and residential subdivisions. Although the overall percent of permit denial was small, for most projects that were deemed to have a potentially adverse affect on wetlands, natural habitat, scenic vistas, or beach access the commissions used th

感情

Bandscheiben- und vertebragene Erkrankungene 1000-yard permit area. We have examined the general stringency of permit decisions, their consistency with statutory objectives, the major variables affecting those decisions, and the impacts of the permit process on public access, wetlands, and housing costs.

dissent

Trauma: zerebral, spinal, peripher neurogenthe policy outputs (decisions) of the implementing agencies, (2) target group compliance with those decisions, (3) the . impacts (both intended and unintended) of those decision, (4) the . impacts of agency policies as seen by the general public and relevant political elites, and (5) the political s