Titlebook: Calculated Choices in Policy-Making; The Theory and Pract Michiel S. Vries Book 1999 Michiel S. de Vries 1999 action.assessment.decision-ma

使長(zhǎng)胖

Determining how well alternatives score on criteria,This chapter examines the requirements criterion scores have to satisfy theoretically, which methods are available to do so, and how they are dealt with in practice. This last aspect is investigated on the basis of content analysis of environmental assessment reports.

不可接觸

Compilation into a ranking order,This chapter focuses on the compilation methods of seven analytical techniques. By using the same example for each technique, it will become clear how ranking orders are brought about. After clarifying a compilation method, the rationale behind the technique will be discussed.

liposuction

干旱

Analysing the outcomes,ld satisfy in order to be meaningful. The influence of adding criteria and/or alternatives with regard to outcomes will be discussed. Outcomes will turn out to vary by adding alternatives and/or criteria. Finally, recommendations will be made concerning the use of the analytical methods.

無(wú)辜

Leave the decision to the decision makers,main. Given its limitations, decisions about the content of this book needed to be made. In doing so, the main criteria were understanding of the methods, critical reflection and practicability when evaluating reports using these methods.

顯微鏡

http://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/220833.jpg

拋射物

Konturen eines meta-strategischen Denkensmple, a comparison will be made between the impact assessment model and classic cost-benefit analysis. In addition, the model will be positioned within the framework of evaluation research, given that impact assessments are in fact a form of multi-criteria evaluation. Finally, the steps of the model

gonioscopy

Neuland des strategischen Denkens choice system and the calculating system. The discussion focuses on the question whether the problems that arise can be overcome using the model discussed in Chapter 1. Usually the assumption is that choices made using the model are more rational than intuitive choices and result in better outcomes

懶鬼才會(huì)衰弱

Konturen eines meta-strategischen Denkensheory and research about an optimum number of alternatives and criteria? Does the quality of decision-making improve in relation to the amount of information used to solve a policy problem? What factors determine whether an actor collects more or less information relevant to his policy problem? What

commonsense

Monika Sobiesiak,Susanne Korhammers will be analysed. The deliberation process will be explicitly dealt with. Analysis will show that policy makers and evaluation researchers do not pay enough attention to prioritizing. The determination of relative importance (weights) seems to be rather arbitrary. Weights, although meant to be use