Titlebook: Cabinets in Western Europe; Jean Blondel (External Professor of Political Scie Book 1997Latest edition Jean Blondel and Ferdinand Müller-R

inroad

書目名稱Cabinets in Western Europe影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Cabinets in Western Europe影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Cabinets in Western Europe網絡公開度




書目名稱Cabinets in Western Europe網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Cabinets in Western Europe被引頻次




書目名稱Cabinets in Western Europe被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Cabinets in Western Europe年度引用




書目名稱Cabinets in Western Europe年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Cabinets in Western Europe讀者反饋




書目名稱Cabinets in Western Europe讀者反饋學科排名

Overthrow

The United Kingdom,nt of government’, the source of most legislative and administrative decisions, and the body that is most fully involved in the major decisions of government (Mackintosh, 1977). This conventional view of the cabinet emphasises its position ‘at the apex of the executive’ (Gordon Walker, 1973) and its

fibroblast

callous

Encumber

Belgium: A Complex Cabinet in a Fragmented Polity, listed in the constitution, but he does not have personal responsibility as his decision must be countersigned by a minister in order to be valid. On the other hand, his person is inviolable in both the public and private (civil and penal) fields. The King and the ministers belong simultaneously to

Nomadic

France: Cabinet Decision-Making under the Fifth Republic,ence of a public debate between the members of the government in an article entitled ‘Governing differently’ (., 20 April 1982). This point of view divided the members of the government as well as the majority because it acted counter to the traditional conception of governmental decision-making whi

Nomadic

incontinence

follicle

Austria: Routine and Ritual,l Government, as the collective top executive body is officially called. This is rather surprising, since the political culture of the country usually places a great deal of emphasis on legality and legal regulations. However, the few explicit norms concerning the cabinet have been supplemented by c

CHASE