Titlebook: Business Process Management Workshops; BPM 2007 Internation Arthur Hofstede,Boualem Benatallah,Hye-Young Paik Conference proceedings 2008 S

Mutter

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-92515-2arios that need to be covered by the workflow are hard to predict. Workflow management systems (WfMSs), serving as the main vehicle of business process execution, should recognize those limits, and increase its support to designers in this task. One aspect of such assistance is in exception handlers

Common-Migraine

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-92515-2eployed and running processes. In particular, simulation experiments in existing process simulation environments start from an empty execution state. We investigate the requirements for a process simulation environment that allows simulation experiments to start from an intermediate execution state.

orthodox

Mindfulness

Kunstkommunikation durch Medienassessing the quality of the models discovered by these algorithms. In this paper, we motivate the need for such an evaluation mechanism, and outline elements of an evaluation framework that is intended to enable (a) process mining researchers to compare the performance of their algorithms, and (b)

garrulous

功多汁水

鞠躬

Elisabeth Fuchs,Barbara Lenzgeigerh to business process redesign is using redesign best practices. A previous study identified a set of 29 different redesign best practices [18]. However, little is known about the exact impact of these redesign best practices on workflow performance..This study proposes an approach that can be used

背叛者

魅力

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43047-4types and associations, state machines, collaboration diagrams, etc. Process modeling on the other hand, provides a different approach whereby behaviour is captured in terms of activities, flow dependencies, resources, etc. These two approaches have their relative advantages. In object models, behav

CREEK