Titlebook: Burke, Paine, and the Rights of Man; A Difference of Poli R. R. Fennessy Book 1963 Springer Netherlands 1963 Institution.Reformation.educat

Clique

書目名稱Burke, Paine, and the Rights of Man影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Burke, Paine, and the Rights of Man影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Burke, Paine, and the Rights of Man網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Burke, Paine, and the Rights of Man網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Burke, Paine, and the Rights of Man被引頻次




書目名稱Burke, Paine, and the Rights of Man被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Burke, Paine, and the Rights of Man年度引用




書目名稱Burke, Paine, and the Rights of Man年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Burke, Paine, and the Rights of Man讀者反饋




書目名稱Burke, Paine, and the Rights of Man讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Gleason-score

,Thomas Paine: The Man and His Ideas 1737–1790,r and exciseman, he emigrated to the new world in 1774. During the American war of independence he earned some fame and some reward by his political writings, particularly . (1776) and ., a series of articles published between 1776 and 1783. In these writings he already uses most of the ideas that w

殺人

inscribe

Burke Rejects the Rights of Man,ight lead one to expect: a calm and impartial assessment of the French revolution. At first sight, it appears to be rather a long, meandering, disorderly, polemical disquisition, as much concerned with the English as with the French revolution, and not very appropriately presented in the form of a l

明確

Paine Replies to Burke: , part in it himself, by some publication which, he hoped, would have an influence comparable to that of . in the American revolution. He was in close contact with Lafayette, who seems to have supplied him with materials for an account of the events of 1789. In January 1790 Lafayette wrote to Washing

胎兒

faction

and Public Opinion, 1791, of them do so. Some scarcely mention Burke at all; others take care to point out how much they disagree with him, as well as with Paine; not one seriously considers Burke’s contention that the French revolution is the application of a false political philosophy which also threatens England. This is

infatuation

Conclusion,id not, indeed, regain his position in the Portland Whigs, for Portland remained unwilling to break with Fox, and so Burke did not succeed in doing that “service to the party” which had been one of his main objects in writing ... Nevertheless he began once more to exercise a considerable influence o

intrigue

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2341-5ry and political world. Newspapers such as . and . published extracts from it. “Within our remembrance” wrote . on 2 November, “no publication has excited more anxious curiosity.” King George III was reported to have said that every gentleman should read it, and as gentlemen hastened to comply, the

adipose-tissue