Titlebook: Browning the Revisionary; John Woolford Book 1988 John Woolford 1988 Britain.history of literature.literature.nineteenth century.British a

industrious

書目名稱Browning the Revisionary影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Browning the Revisionary影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Browning the Revisionary網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Browning the Revisionary網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Browning the Revisionary被引頻次




書目名稱Browning the Revisionary被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Browning the Revisionary年度引用




書目名稱Browning the Revisionary年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Browning the Revisionary讀者反饋




書目名稱Browning the Revisionary讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Costume

輕率的你

Marx, Berkeley and Bad Abstractionsudiates this willingness to revise. In reissuing ., Browning noted that his attempts to revise it in the spirit of 1849 had proved unsuccessful, if not misguided: ‘a(chǎn)fter all, I imagined another thing at first, and therefore leave as I fmd it’. And other poems too were left as found, even, in many instances, reverting to a pre–. reading.

輕觸

The Structure of the Revised ,udiates this willingness to revise. In reissuing ., Browning noted that his attempts to revise it in the spirit of 1849 had proved unsuccessful, if not misguided: ‘a(chǎn)fter all, I imagined another thing at first, and therefore leave as I fmd it’. And other poems too were left as found, even, in many instances, reverting to a pre–. reading.

HAUNT

The Division of Labour and Its Overcoming,third not named but clearly presaging the dramatic monologue.. The grounds on which Sordello distinguishes these, and mounts them into an ascending series, is their sensitivity to the morality of the reader-writer relation. In epic, the earliest form, the poet controls the reader’s response by telling him what to think about the action:

Admonish

浸軟

STENT

Minatory

The Division of Labour and Its Overcoming,areful ‘to supply [them] with no other materials than [they] can combine into an intelligible whole’.. This definition both typifies Browning’s commitment to his public, and foreshadows its central problem. The poet will write only what his audience will find ‘intelligible’. The audience will take r

judiciousness