Titlebook: Broadway and Corporate Capitalism; The Rise of the Prof Michael Schwartz Book 2009 Michael Schwartz 2009 drama.Romanticism.theatre

obsess

書目名稱Broadway and Corporate Capitalism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Broadway and Corporate Capitalism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Broadway and Corporate Capitalism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Broadway and Corporate Capitalism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Broadway and Corporate Capitalism被引頻次




書目名稱Broadway and Corporate Capitalism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Broadway and Corporate Capitalism年度引用




書目名稱Broadway and Corporate Capitalism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Broadway and Corporate Capitalism讀者反饋




書目名稱Broadway and Corporate Capitalism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

affluent

indecipherable

流眼淚

雇傭兵

BADGE

flaggy

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-99205-5 evolve an entirely new type of actor,” whereas the current male stars seemed only “as dim shadows cast before” (“Matinee Lady” 2). What do the “dim shadows” of the 1890s have to say to us about the period? And how do we know?

天空

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13186-1ch for order” was the playing field. The college football field emerged as a key “realm of upper-class revitalization” (Lears, “American Advertising” 61). Although most team athletics fulfilled this function to greater or lesser degrees, football nevertheless provided the key “field” of manhood. As Harvey Green writes,

高深莫測(cè)

fatty-acids