Titlebook: British Rule and the Indian Economy 1800–1914; Neil Charlesworth Textbook 1982Latest edition The Economic History Society 1982 Diffusion.f

Neogamist

書目名稱British Rule and the Indian Economy 1800–1914影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱British Rule and the Indian Economy 1800–1914影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Rule and the Indian Economy 1800–1914網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱British Rule and the Indian Economy 1800–1914網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Rule and the Indian Economy 1800–1914被引頻次




書目名稱British Rule and the Indian Economy 1800–1914被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Rule and the Indian Economy 1800–1914年度引用




書目名稱British Rule and the Indian Economy 1800–1914年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Rule and the Indian Economy 1800–1914讀者反饋




書目名稱British Rule and the Indian Economy 1800–1914讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

褲子

Testing Alternative Explanations of Growthlly by an important and populous less developed country, characterised in 1800 by typically low levels of output but possessing a tradition of high-quality handicraft production and merchant enterprise. However, India also presents the classic case study of the effects of formal imperialism on a non

–吃

Testing Alternative Explanations of Growthof striking provincial variation. The large Bengal Presidency, the first great territorial acquisition, boasted a . system, in which the British had conferred rights of revenue payment and landlord and magisterial status on the . overlords. Throughout most of the south and west ‘however’—in the Bomb

惰性女人

justify

Theories of Market and Government Failures, new influences and forces upon the sub-continent’s development. Of these, one of the most striking was a large inflow of foreign capital. Whilst statistics, especially on the period before 1870, cannot be definitive, it seems that the total volume of British investment in India stood at about ￡160

諷刺滑稽戲劇

Market Failures and What to Do About It?.British India. Alleged . official attitudes and non-interventionist policies are frequently allotted much blame for shortcomings of Indian development in the nineteenth century. Thus, even Morris, for all his claims for ‘substantial growth’, concludes that ‘the “night watchman” policies of the stat

sacrum

碎石頭

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05150-2Diffusion; finance; growth; labour; production; productivity; utility

fender

The Economic History Society 1982

Oversee