Titlebook: British Public Attitudes to Nuclear Defence; Peter M. Jones,Gordon Reece Textbook 1990Latest edition Peter M. Jones and Gordon Reece 1990

輕舟

書目名稱British Public Attitudes to Nuclear Defence影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱British Public Attitudes to Nuclear Defence影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Public Attitudes to Nuclear Defence網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱British Public Attitudes to Nuclear Defence網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Public Attitudes to Nuclear Defence被引頻次




書目名稱British Public Attitudes to Nuclear Defence被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Public Attitudes to Nuclear Defence年度引用




書目名稱British Public Attitudes to Nuclear Defence年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Public Attitudes to Nuclear Defence讀者反饋




書目名稱British Public Attitudes to Nuclear Defence讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

GENUS

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20672-8Defence; defence policy; development; interview; Political Parties; statistics; weapons

inflame

Peter M. Jones and Gordon Reece 1990

Benzodiazepines

變形詞

intention

Mehdi Piri Damagh,Michael Faureblic opinion at a given time, this survey has attempted to develop a deeper understanding of why people believe what they appear to believe. It was inspired by a similar survey undertaken in the United States in 1984, which some people believe had a major effect on the conduct of the presidential election campaign of the year.

homeostasis

Biguanides

辯論

Mehdi Piri Damagh,Michael Faure of opinions which tend to be held by a single individual and thus to try to infer some typical profiles of belief about nuclear weapons; and finally to try to correlate these views with determinants such as age, sex and social class. The two subsequent chapters will look at the characteristics of t

brother