Titlebook: British Identities, Heroic Nationalisms, and the Gothic Novel, 1764-1824; Toni Wein Book 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan

ARGOT

書目名稱British Identities, Heroic Nationalisms, and the Gothic Novel, 1764-1824影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱British Identities, Heroic Nationalisms, and the Gothic Novel, 1764-1824影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Identities, Heroic Nationalisms, and the Gothic Novel, 1764-1824網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱British Identities, Heroic Nationalisms, and the Gothic Novel, 1764-1824網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Identities, Heroic Nationalisms, and the Gothic Novel, 1764-1824被引頻次




書目名稱British Identities, Heroic Nationalisms, and the Gothic Novel, 1764-1824被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Identities, Heroic Nationalisms, and the Gothic Novel, 1764-1824年度引用




書目名稱British Identities, Heroic Nationalisms, and the Gothic Novel, 1764-1824年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Identities, Heroic Nationalisms, and the Gothic Novel, 1764-1824讀者反饋




書目名稱British Identities, Heroic Nationalisms, and the Gothic Novel, 1764-1824讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

吞噬

978-1-349-42961-5Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2002

moratorium

非實(shí)體

padding

eustachian-tube

Geological Oceanography of the Bering Shelf,t cousins, eyes and mouth cavernous in wondering amaze, those words signal the heartfelt approval of teller . tale, the successful summoning of chills, dread, sorrow, joy, despair — the gamut of emotions conjurable in an audience. Most of the time, such a reaction confines itself to young audiences,

Alopecia-Areata

acclimate

Antonio Terlizzi,David R. Schiel family. The family resemblances go beyond the ‘miraculous birth’ myth attending both creations. War and taxation set the stage for the story in both cases. And like that earlier foundational birth, the new hero arises at a moment of ‘tyrannical oppression.’ Yet the class targets of that oppression

Ingest

Generosity

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34827-4ferences will help us see how accusations that Radcliffe painted black-and-white portraits of good and evil overstate the case. Admittedly, her settings frequently give good reason for such an accusation, especially when the scene starkly (‘cruelly’ as Radcliffe would have it) contrasts with the fee