Titlebook: British Diplomacy and the Iranian Revolution, 1978-1981; Luman Ali Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Revoluti

離開可分裂

Nazli Choucri,Dinsha Mistree,Carlos I. Ortizb and Komitehs ran amok. Ali provides examples of the difficulties of dealing with revolutionary regimes such as the French, Bolshevik, and Chinese as well as chronicling the particular difficulties faced with engaging with the Iranian revolutionaries. A profile of Khomeini is provided by Ali with a

雕鏤

實(shí)現(xiàn)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6071-7ain in early September 1980 to close its embassy in Iran and operate as an interests section, with Sweden acting as a protecting power. The departure of Sir John Graham with no direct replacement put in place is also detailed by Ali in addition to the frustrations of embassy staff in Tehran and the

路標(biāo)

Agnieszka Gehringer,Susann Kowalskie purpose(s) of interests sections as well as their advantages and disadvantages within the existing diplomatic literature with the British interests section in Kampala in Idi Amin’s reign serving as a comparison. Ali provides insight into the continued challenges of engaging with a revolutionary re

HALO

放棄

Introduction, diplomats in dealing with Iran between 1978 and 1981 through events such as the fall of the Shah, the Islamic revolution, post-revolutionary turmoil in the new Islamic Republic, the American embassy hostage crisis and Britain conducting business in Iran via an ‘interests section’ under a protecting

去才蔑視

,Britain’s Relationship with Iran Before the 1970s,n in-depth analysis of the British diplomatic experience in Iran before the 1970s through the Reuter concession, tobacco protests, Iran’s constitutional revolution, the formation of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC), Anglo-Persian treaty of 1919, the ascent and deposition of Colonel Reza Khan Pah

靦腆

蘆筍

用不完