Titlebook: Britain and the Netherlands in Europe and Asia; Papers delivered to J. S. Bromley,E. H. Kossmann Book 1968 Palgrave Macmillan, a division

Addendum

書目名稱Britain and the Netherlands in Europe and Asia影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Britain and the Netherlands in Europe and Asia影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain and the Netherlands in Europe and Asia網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Britain and the Netherlands in Europe and Asia網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain and the Netherlands in Europe and Asia被引頻次




書目名稱Britain and the Netherlands in Europe and Asia被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain and the Netherlands in Europe and Asia年度引用




書目名稱Britain and the Netherlands in Europe and Asia年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain and the Netherlands in Europe and Asia讀者反饋




書目名稱Britain and the Netherlands in Europe and Asia讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

FLEET

English Attitudes to Europe in the Seventeenth Century,omparatively little direct influence, less for example than Sweden and Turkey, and her policies were inconsistent, changing almost as often and as violently as the internal politics of the country. Obviously internal instability was largely responsible for external powerlessness, but there were othe

tattle

Aspects of Dutch Colonial Development in Asia in the Seventeenth Century,y was investigated almost exclusively by Dutch colonial historians, who placed greatest emphasis on the history of the colonial administration in Indonesia, the former Dutch East Indies. Only a few historians occupied themselves with the territories lost by the Dutch in the past or still possessed i

Console

不可接觸

大范圍流行

,The Netherlands in the European Scene, 1813–1913,immediately add that it turned out to be a rather second-rate one, decidedly not conspicuous for large-scale heroism or revolutionary fervour. For its success, conditioned of course by the allied victory over Napoleon, should be credited before all others one great man, the former regent Gijsbert Ka

Increment

煞費(fèi)苦心

哀悼

The Netherlands as an Imperial Power in South-East Asia in the Nineteenth Century and After,n extend his epigram by saying that the next most important thing in the history of an empire is the history of the territory towards which the expansion of the mother-country has been directed. We can also modify it in as much as the history of an empire may include a phase in which the colony, not

famine