Titlebook: Britain and Norway in Europe Since 1945; Outsiders Geir K. Almlid Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusiv

Hayes

書目名稱Britain and Norway in Europe Since 1945影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Britain and Norway in Europe Since 1945影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain and Norway in Europe Since 1945網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Britain and Norway in Europe Since 1945網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain and Norway in Europe Since 1945被引頻次




書目名稱Britain and Norway in Europe Since 1945被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain and Norway in Europe Since 1945年度引用




書目名稱Britain and Norway in Europe Since 1945年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain and Norway in Europe Since 1945讀者反饋




書目名稱Britain and Norway in Europe Since 1945讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

類似思想

障礙

,Fighting Supranationalism, 1950–1959,n-policy questions for British and Norwegian governments in the 1950s. This chapter discusses the initial reactions and the chosen strategies. It finds that a global perspective endured in Britain during the first decade after the Second World War. The attitude of UK governments to the European inte

Liberate

詩集

,Successful EC Negotiations—Unsuccessful Referendum, 1970–1972,fferent motives for applying are discussed, showing that in Britain, membership was fuelled more by political motivations. In Norway economic arguments were more important. Moreover, the two countries’ different negotiation strategies and tactics are analysed. The British Heath government had a more

松果

歌曲

死亡率

,Norwegian Europeanisation and British Opt-Outs, 1995–2009,y were not equally eager to have NATO go “out of area”. The main question, however, is how Britain and Norway dealt with the European Union (EU) growing wider and deeper. After the 1994 referendum, Norway developed into the most integrated of the non-members. It became an integral part of the Single

JOG

凝視

,Britain and Norway in Europe—Continuity and Changes,examined in the previous chapters, but rather discusses some major themes for the entire 75-year period. Two main interlinked perspectives are considered. The first is the UK-Norwegian bilateral relationship in terms of trade, security, and political and European relations. It finds that in all thes