Titlebook: Breaking the Frames; Anthropological Conu Pamela J. Stewart,Andrew J. Strathern Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2

hereditary

Framing History,stead of Frazer’s rationalist scheme regarding magic as pseudoscience. I.C. Jarvie in turn criticized the work of the functionalists, using the case of cargo cults in the Pacific, and arguing that a new theory was needed to account for change, highlighting situational logic.

寵愛

Processes,ity of Baktaman ideas, and the workings of secret knowledge, leading him to consider memory, loss of information, and ritual variation among different groups. He eschewed whole system typologies and a temptation to impose too structured an interpretation of data. His work verges on what we now call embodiment theory.

枯燥

Retreat of the Social? Where to?,aises the problem of what to do with society and culture, suggesting that we should focus on creativity; and Thomas Ernst, who again warns against reducing social life to individual action. However, the individual and the social should not be seen in closed dichotomous terms, but as open and mutually constituting relationships.

防水

The Contours of the Postwar Rightquate to grasp the phenomenon. Comparison between cases in Papua New Guinea helps to show similarities and differences. A mindful approach helps to steer a pathway through the construction and deconstruction of theories.

contradict

Vldl379

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002129nking. Since the body/mind distinction underlies the kinship debates, it is useful to note that the concept of mental versus physical health dichotomizes life processes that must be recognized as embodied and holistic.

親密

Schlemms-Canal

Making Peace With Your Adult Childrenans. This, however, is not found in the Piraha language of Amazonia studied by Everett. Everett offered ‘intelligence’ as the factor enabling language acquisition, but the ability to combine patterns gets us closer to the processes involved.

形狀

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6437-3e to draw productively on American and British traditions of analysis, refusing to join bandwagons, and insisting on meeting the challenges each field area presented. He followed what can also be advocated generally, the aim of bringing theory and description appropriately together, as he did in ..

Harbor