Titlebook: Brazil under Lula; Economy, Politics, a Joseph L. Love (Professor of History Emeritus),Wer Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Natu

Conducive

India’s Act East Policy Begins in Myanmar, and involve politically sensitive goods and service, often produced by foreign companies (Levy and Spiller 1996, Savedoff and Spiller 1999). These characteristics make the industries in these sectors particularly prone to governmental opportunism, so that investment will only materialize in an eff

建筑師

阻擋

Piti Srisangnam,Anupama Devendrakumaronomists, with a fundamental social dimension of power, resulting from the action of influential agents interested in specific policy decisions. Policies are regarded as stemming from the interaction between the regime—the administration in power—and influential agents with interests in policy issue

一大塊

osculate

DEFER

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1794-3ecessors. When he took office in January 2003, Lula created the new Ministry of Social Development and Fight against Hunger (.) to manage the country’s investments aimed at reducing poverty, combating hunger, increasing school attendance, and improving the number of people—especially children—who re

chondromalacia

Mainstreaming versus Alienation ring the 1990s, the Cardoso administration together with state and local governments, focused on improving Brazil’s abysmal record in education. For example, in 1990, adults over age 15 had on average only 4 years of schooling (World Bank 2007). Under Cardoso, the federal government made sweeping ch

Pedagogy

Mainstreaming versus Alienation structural change from a public toward a private system. A sequence of changes in some procedures and rules amounts to a gradual reform within the current system, without major ruptures. These changes were inspired mostly by the government’s goal of reducing the financial and actuarial disequilibri

SUGAR

leniency

Mainstreaming Integration GovernanceDuring the past two decades economic policy in Brazil has been the final product of a game of unstable rules when even constitutional rules—supposedly the most durable set of institutions in a representative democracy—have been changing with high frequency and variable range. Table 3.1 quantifies that low degree of institutional stability.