| 期刊全稱 | Brain Tumor Pathology: Current Diagnostic Hotspots and Pitfalls | | 影響因子2023 | Davide Schiffer | | 視頻video | http://file.papertrans.cn/191/190243/190243.mp4 | | 圖書封面 |  | | 影響因子 | Since Bailey and Cushing (1926), all brain tumor classifications have been called histogenetic. The nosographic position that the tumor types progressively acquired in the classification systems derived from the resemblance of tumor cells to those of the cytogenesis, modified whenever new information became available from different biological research fields and especially from molecular genetics. Classically, on the basis of the rough correspondence between the mature/immature aspect of tumor cells and the benign/malignant biological behavior of the tumors, the histological labels contained a prognostic significance. The supposed origin of the tumors was thus a factor for prognosis. Later on, with the concept of anaplasia (Cox, 1933; Kernohan et al., 1949) new criteria were introduced for establishing the malignancy grades of tumors. Immunohistochemistry and later molecular genetics further refined the prognostic diagnoses, substantially increasing the opportunities to recognize the cell origin of tumors, beside revealing the pathogenetic mechanisms. Prognoses became more accurate, as required by the greater and more targeted possibilities of therapy. | | Pindex | Book 2006 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋|
派博傳思國際
( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328)
GMT+8, 2025-10-12 21:54
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:38:25
