Titlebook: Brain Injury and Recovery; Theoretical and Cont Stanley Finger,T. E. Levere,Donald G. Stein (Dean Book 1988 Plenum Press, New York 1988 Ar

警告

HUMID

Jejune

Marcin Blachnik,Miros?aw Kordosat least at the physiological level in adults. “Compensation,” on the other hand, implies that one part may substitute for another to a greater or lesser degree. This concept arose almost inevitably from the theoretical base that he constructed for all of modem neurology.

BLUSH

Obedient

FADE

debacle

Toward a Definition of Recovery of Function,fine or describe different phenomena. Descriptions of various behavioral outcomes after brain damage lack consistent and precise terminology, and no where is this more apparent than with the use of the term “recovery of function.” Four case studies illustrate the problem.

消毒

Neural System Imbalances and the Consequence of Large Brain Injuries,of eating popovers. Dr. Seuss noted that it was Uncle Terwillinger’s suggestion that “to eat these things, you must exercise great care. You may swallow down what is solid, . . . but you must spit out what is air!” Given the range of beliefs concerning the consequences of brain injury, it appears th

攤位

SMART

Kurt Goldstein and Recovery of Function, conceptions of recovery. The term “holistic” is frequently used rather casually, so it needs some clarification. It refers to the fundamental assumption that it is impossible to consider a biological phenomenon in isolation; it must be considered in the context of the biological system, the environ