Titlebook: Boycotts Past and Present; From the American Re David Feldman Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 Boycott, Dives

homocysteine

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4399-6national consumer boycotts of grapes and lettuce. Alongside labor strikes, these boycotts helped agricultural workers make advances in their rights and conditions of work. The UFW campaigns remain significant in the histories of US Latinos, labor, and global boycotts for their strategic use of civil

Intentional

一起

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248335a analogy is frequently invoked to justify BDS against Israel, the political economy and social conflict dynamics in both cases are radically different, making it unlikely that ‘success’ can simply be replicated. In South Africa, BDS were used to supplement an active liberation struggle; in Palestin

雕鏤

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248335l discussion at Brooklyn College as a case study, this chapter analyzes the discourse surrounding BDS debates by way of a frame analysis of the positions of BDS advocates and BDS opponents. It shows that some frames are bound to clash, such as those highlighting Antiracism versus Antisemitism, or Je

游行

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248335e use and experience of boycotts as a campaigning tactic, applied to goods, shops, or people linked to Israel, was present throughout that period, usually accompanied by allegations that antisemitism was either a motivating factor or a consequence of anti-Israel boycotts. In every case, the local im

不公開(kāi)

使增至最大

judicial

Figate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94872-0Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions; Antisemitism; Israel; American Revolution; Captain Boycott; Civil Righ

Pruritus

978-3-319-94871-3The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019