找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights; Roberto Bin,Sara Lorenzon,Nicola Lucchi Conference proceedings 2012 Springer Milan 2012 biotec

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 根深蒂固
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:36:49 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 09:44:51 | 只看該作者
The Turbulence of Academic Collaborationfocused on the “common heritage argument” according to which genetic human heritage is a common good that cannot be subject to intellectual property rules. First of all the most important theories on genetic heritage as common good are illustrated, then the relationship between patents and access to
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:49:09 | 只看該作者
Issues and Rights in DNA-based Inventionsl issues that result from the patenting of biotech inventions with a specific emphasis on the effects of Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) patents and their potential to interfere with fundamental individual rights and civil liberties.
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:17:37 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22030-3l issues that result from the patenting of biotech inventions with a specific emphasis on the effects of Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) patents and their potential to interfere with fundamental individual rights and civil liberties.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:12:04 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:39:54 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 07:28:11 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2032-0biotech innovations; biotech patents; fundamental rights; genetic research; genetica data
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:49:34 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:06:12 | 只看該作者
Patentability Requirements of Biotech Inventions at the European Patent Office: Ethical IssuesThe main patentability criteria applied by the European Patent Office on inventions in the Biotech field are herein discussed, with particular reference to the ethical aspects related to this field of technology.
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 18:06:19 | 只看該作者
Daryl John Powell,Erlend Alfnes,Eivind Rekeontroversy as a paradigmatic example, I reflect on the importance of fundamental rights as an institutional safeguard against the expansionary tendency of intellectual property law and on the role of the judiciary as guarantor of social cohesion, endangered by the disruptive effects of market rationality.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 22:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
平安县| 岗巴县| 潞城市| 金沙县| 辽宁省| 盐池县| 乐清市| 遂平县| 威远县| 玉树县| 大英县| 晴隆县| 齐齐哈尔市| 基隆市| 揭西县| 静海县| 台山市| 泰兴市| 湄潭县| 门头沟区| 大竹县| 内丘县| 密山市| 宁德市| 蒲城县| 台东市| 玉树县| 奎屯市| 峨眉山市| 阳曲县| 全州县| 安多县| 搜索| 富锦市| 林甸县| 邳州市| 新闻| 阿坝| 甘孜| 白银市| 柏乡县|