找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Biomedical Ethics Reviews · 1989; James M. Humber,Robert F. Almeder Book 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990 Biomedical eth

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 誤解
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 05:54:06 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:57:07 | 只看該作者
Should Abnormal Fetuses Be Brought to Term for the Sole Purpose of Providing Infant Transplant Organsuch beings of such little personhood that they can be considered to be objects, capable of being used for the good of others? Can such beings be brought to term simply and solely for the purpose of using them as a collection of organs to benefit others through transplant technology?
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 15:31:14 | 只看該作者
0742-1796 l importance in bioethics today. Three topics are discussed in the present volume: (1) Should Abnormal Fetuses Be Brought to Term for the Sole Purpose of Providing Infant Transplant Organs? (2) Should Physicians Dispense Drugs for Profit? and (3) Should Human Death Be Taken to Occur When Persons Per
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 17:55:38 | 只看該作者
Laborpraxis Bd 4: Analytische Methodensuch beings of such little personhood that they can be considered to be objects, capable of being used for the good of others? Can such beings be brought to term simply and solely for the purpose of using them as a collection of organs to benefit others through transplant technology?
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 20:43:35 | 只看該作者
0742-1796 of advancing bioethical discussion, is admirably served by the pieces collected herein. We look forward to the next volume in our series, and very much hope the reader will also.978-1-4757-4638-9978-1-59259-444-3Series ISSN 0742-1796
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:51:06 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 08:18:10 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 10:35:38 | 只看該作者
The Case for Physician-Dispensed Drugsinadvisable for physicians to dispense drugs; others have taken a stronger line and argued that physicians ought to be regulated out of the drug-dispensing business. In what follows, I will consider some of the arguments that might be given for outlawing the dispensing of drugs by physicians and exp
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:14:45 | 只看該作者
Should Physicians Dispense Drugs for a Profit?enth century, this division has been honored more in the breach than in the observance, particularly in Britain and America. For most of American history, physicians dispensed and apothecaries prescribed. Only in modern times has there been a formal distinction between the two.
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 18:34:54 | 只看該作者
Definition and Deathnition of death persists. The current controversy focuses on those individuals who are in a state of permanent unconsciousness, but not “brain dead.” Whole-brain advocates generally define death as the permanent cessation of the functioning of the organism as a whole. In their view, these patients a
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 09:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
霞浦县| 汤阴县| 巴青县| 响水县| 麻江县| 定西市| 普宁市| 敦化市| 福海县| 陇川县| 鹤庆县| 舞钢市| 都安| 弥渡县| 罗山县| 房产| 大冶市| 抚顺市| 且末县| 霍山县| 张家口市| 新绛县| 万盛区| 调兵山市| 延寿县| 南郑县| 松滋市| 习水县| 土默特左旗| 修武县| 广宗县| 信丰县| 灌阳县| 山丹县| 梨树县| 新建县| 弋阳县| 得荣县| 托里县| 托克逊县| 化德县|