Titlebook: Bioeconomy and Sustainability; Perspectives from Na Dirk Lanzerath,Ulrich Schurr,Mandy Stake Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and Th

無(wú)王時(shí)期,

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26127-6 food security in regards of climate change and population growth. Based on a literature review of recent articles, I argue that due to climate change and the anticipated population growth, moral conflicts will very likely arise regarding food security by implementing a bioeconomy based on biofuels.

SOB

商業(yè)上

Debrief

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41437-5economy in the period from 1995 to 2015. Using the German subsidy database “F?rderkatalog” of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, we find that regions with a lower share of knowledge-intensive industries are more often engaged in bioeconomy projects outside of the biotechnology core. Mor

黑豹

PANIC

不足的東西

,Kompromi? als neues Paradigma,ed organisms to undergo time- and cost-intensive approval procedures and labelling as genetically modified. For a better understanding of the discourse, the chapter also describes the general attitude towards biotechnologies in both countries in the past and illustrates insights into the social acce

甜得發(fā)膩

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-95190-8scounted flow of current and future generations’ well-being, and use a discount rate and the term felicity, which both have been criticized. Furthermore, it may be criticized that, here, felicity is based on the consumption of capital assets. Any felicity that is not based on consumption, for exampl

墻壁

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16678-6erexploitation. The results demonstrate that even significant improvements in economic efficiency, either through higher factor productivity (technological advance) or higher biomass availability (biotechnological innovations), only stimulate resource overexploitation, unavoidable taking the system

夾死提手勢(shì)