Titlebook: Biodiversity Offsets Between Regulation and Voluntary Commitment; A Typology of Approa Marianne Darbi Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland

Leaven

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94024-3ion activities. Building on this premise, the paradigm of “no net loss” has risen to prominence in a worldwide context and particularly with respect to EU policy. In this scope, biodiversity offsets are increasingly explored and promoted to reach the no net loss goal..Biodiversity offsets are the la

anticipate

Obvious

Perspektiven kritischer Sozialer Arbeitfferent contexts. In practice, voluntariness has a long tradition, i.e., it is anchored in societal and ethical discourses, with regard to solidarity, the provision of common goods and voluntary commitment. However, voluntariness is a relatively new phenomenon in a scientific context..Therefore, thi

Basilar-Artery

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94024-3rooted in numerous compensation approaches worldwide, ranging from long-standing schemes such as US Wetland Mitigation, German Impact Mitigation Regulation, and Australian offset schemes to the recent uptake of biodiversity offsets in several European countries, e.g., France, the United Kingdom, Spa

享樂主義者

Kritik der Tafeln in Deutschland“intuitive types”) that was refined in several steps throughout the research process and over time. (2) Building on the theoretical analysis of the concept of voluntariness, attributes, or criteria were extracted from the literature that provided the theoretical frame of reference to analyze the deg

Graduated

Kritik der Tafeln in Deutschlanduired by law and enforced; (2) Conditional biodiversity offsets: required by financial institutions; (3) Enabled biodiversity offsets: fostered by governments (case 3a: enabled biodiversity offsets—by government) and NGOs (case 3b: enabled biodiversity offsets—new global norms) through pilot schemes

ANTIC