Titlebook: Bioarchaeological Analyses and Bodies; New Ways of Knowing Pamela K. Stone Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG 2018 anatomical

傷害

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioarchaeological Analyses and Bodies影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioarchaeological Analyses and Bodies影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioarchaeological Analyses and Bodies網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioarchaeological Analyses and Bodies網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioarchaeological Analyses and Bodies被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioarchaeological Analyses and Bodies被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioarchaeological Analyses and Bodies年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioarchaeological Analyses and Bodies年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioarchaeological Analyses and Bodies讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioarchaeological Analyses and Bodies讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

憤怒事實(shí)

全等

Operational Activity and Connections,ined scientific and social order rather than fluid historical texts and agents. Hortense Spillers’ body/flesh distinction is used to deconstruct [our] bioanthropological sense of how we “breathe life into” or “put flesh” on these skeletal remains. I conclude with examples of how these social and sci

GULLY

潔凈

細(xì)絲

Mu?ammad Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhāb and Wahhābism, I investigate here the contingencies and considerations that should potentially be incorporated into the use of these collections to generate empirical, standardized diagnostic criteria for pathological conditions. I focus on acquired syphilis, a chronic infectious condition, and survey several of

single

ENACT

IRS

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94093-9e consequence of this normalization of the docile female body, framed as a biological fact, is that it disables female agency in anything beyond reproduction. Reimaging female roles in the past, and locating birthing as a normal biological process within complex social systems, can untangle biology

muster

10 Jim Crace: Inventor of Worlds,hat both males and females likely played in these communities. This study interrogates the way that questions about the “Chaco Phenomenon” have been framed and what this implies about the kinds of data that have been collected and interpreted.