找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Beyond Legal Positivism; The Moral Authority Whitley R. P. Kaufman Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus

[復(fù)制鏈接]
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:29:08 | 只看該作者
OPEC in the Age of Climate Change,t doctrines as normative, we can engage in a genuine debate about the ideals that a legal system should pursue, instead of the current situation in which legal positivists present their normative preferences in the forms of necessary conceptual truths.
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:57:15 | 只看該作者
Normative Legal Positivism,t doctrines as normative, we can engage in a genuine debate about the ideals that a legal system should pursue, instead of the current situation in which legal positivists present their normative preferences in the forms of necessary conceptual truths.
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 12:18:32 | 只看該作者
Book 2023been that there is no necessary connection between law and morality. This book provides a broad but clear and jargon-free account of the central objections to the theory and why those objections are sufficient to show that legal positivism is no longer tenable. This includes a broad critique of the
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:39:02 | 只看該作者
The Function of Law,way to explain and understand a human artifact like law is not in terms of ‘essences’ or necessary properties but in terms of its purpose. The aim of law is to establish a single, comprehensive moral code with which a society can organize itself.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:29:18 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:00:07 | 只看該作者
Book 2023ool arises from a caricatured account of that doctrine, for instance the idea that it requires substantive theological commitments or particular conceptions of human nature. In contrast, the author presents an account of natural law theory that is grounded in a commitment to moral truth, but not to
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 06:05:55 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:51:19 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:14:32 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:47:40 | 只看該作者
The Problem of Legal Authority, law and morality, whether that be expressed through the Separability Thesis or the Social Fact Thesis (that law is a matter of social fact, not moral truth). We show how this doctrine is the fatal weakness of legal positivism, for it renders the theory unable to explain the concept of legal obligat
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 19:32
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
涿鹿县| 平潭县| 拉萨市| 九龙县| 高陵县| 长白| 仪陇县| 金阳县| 曲麻莱县| 晋城| 项城市| 湛江市| 句容市| 吴川市| 蒙自县| 吴江市| 西峡县| 乐业县| 渭源县| 伊金霍洛旗| 星子县| 武鸣县| 怀安县| 双鸭山市| 高邮市| 太和县| 舞阳县| 贵州省| 柞水县| 甘南县| 邵武市| 北川| 山丹县| 武定县| 平凉市| 陆良县| 剑河县| 湘西| 正宁县| 南昌县| 藁城市|