找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Berkeley’s Renovation of Philosophy; Gavin Ardley Book 1968 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1968 George Berkeley.Plato.metaphysic

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 45936|回復(fù): 51
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:31:47 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Berkeley’s Renovation of Philosophy
影響因子2023Gavin Ardley
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/184/183814/183814.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: Berkeley’s Renovation of Philosophy;  Gavin Ardley Book 1968 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1968 George Berkeley.Plato.metaphysic
影響因子In this work I have endeavoured to see Berkeley in his contemporary setting. On the principle that philosophy is ultimately about men, not about abstract problems, I have tried to see Berkeley the philosopher as an expression of Berkeley the man. When this is done, what is perennial in the philosophy may be discerned in and through what is local and temporal. Berkeley then emerges as a pioneer reformer; not so much an innovator as a renovator; one who set out to rescue phi- losophy from the enthusiasms of the preceding age; one who strove to seat philosophy once more on the broad human and common sense foundations laid by Plato and Aristotle. Critical studies of some of the more striking of Berkeley‘s epistemo- logical arguments are legion. They commenced with the young Berke- ley‘s first appearance in print, and have continued to this day. But whether they take the form of professions of support for Berkeley, or of bald refutations of Berkeley‘s supposed fallacies, or whether, like the contemporary "analytical" studies of Moore, Warnock, and Austin, they are subtle exposures of alleged deeply concealed logical muddles, they all tend to share one common characteristic: they select
Pindex Book 1968
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Berkeley’s Renovation of Philosophy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Berkeley’s Renovation of Philosophy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Berkeley’s Renovation of Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Berkeley’s Renovation of Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Berkeley’s Renovation of Philosophy被引頻次




書目名稱Berkeley’s Renovation of Philosophy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Berkeley’s Renovation of Philosophy年度引用




書目名稱Berkeley’s Renovation of Philosophy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Berkeley’s Renovation of Philosophy讀者反饋




書目名稱Berkeley’s Renovation of Philosophy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:36:48 | 只看該作者
The Potentiality of Common Senselato pointed to something analogous in his argument for the primacy of morality: robbers are immoral in their external dealings, but must perforce be moral in their internal dealings. (.. 351 f.) St. Augustine summed up the situation on one pungent phrase: “No vice, however unnatural, can pull nature up by the roots” (., xix, 12).
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:38:32 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:14:50 | 只看該作者
bout abstract problems, I have tried to see Berkeley the philosopher as an expression of Berkeley the man. When this is done, what is perennial in the philosophy may be discerned in and through what is local and temporal. Berkeley then emerges as a pioneer reformer; not so much an innovator as a ren
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:10:45 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:53:09 | 只看該作者
Biomass, Bioenergy, and Biofuels,ey do not enjoy the benefits of literacy; but neither do they suffer from its evils. The illiterate bulk of mankind have never heard sceptical doubts voiced; or if they have so heard they shrug off such reasonings. Illiterate reflections may be eccentric; but they will not be absurd.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:17:13 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:57:50 | 只看該作者
Philosophical Scruples: Their Cause and Cureey do not enjoy the benefits of literacy; but neither do they suffer from its evils. The illiterate bulk of mankind have never heard sceptical doubts voiced; or if they have so heard they shrug off such reasonings. Illiterate reflections may be eccentric; but they will not be absurd.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:59:54 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:42:41 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 23:38
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
民乐县| 邢台市| 遵义县| 漳平市| 长宁县| 平利县| 神木县| 清镇市| 江川县| 得荣县| 罗田县| 静安区| 无极县| 岗巴县| 潮安县| 册亨县| 通许县| 和林格尔县| 瑞丽市| 鹤山市| 鹰潭市| 通州区| 绵阳市| 罗定市| 昌都县| 忻城县| 保德县| 崇信县| 囊谦县| 桐庐县| 屏山县| 万盛区| 且末县| 句容市| 宣威市| 筠连县| 西畴县| 永昌县| 睢宁县| 遂平县| 西城区|