Titlebook: Berkeley; Harry M. Bracken Book 1974 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1974 epistemology.George Berkeley.mode

匍匐前進(jìn)

Sense Variations and Scepticism,… we cannot imagine Colour without extension’. This application of anti-abstractionism gives a powerful and original turn to the attack on the primary/ secondary quality reduction argument available to Berkeley from Bayle. Berkeley says:

Foreknowledge

Notions and Archetypes,ine spirits. Third, I provide a way to make sense of notional knowledge in relation to (a) Berkeleian signs (b) non-terminating judgements and (c) archetypes. Finally, I compare Berkeley’s views with those of Malebranche and the Cartesians.

殘廢的火焰

報(bào)復(fù)

歸功于

: Heterogeneity,born-blind-made-to-see. This thought-experiment is taken to establish that there is no . relation between the data of sight and touch. Indeed it is held that there is a real and radical separation. Extension as seen is not the same as tactual extension. Visual extension is inseparable from colour, a

upstart

牽索

Sense Variations and Scepticism,and specifically against the distinction between primary and secondary qualities. It is a distinction discussed by a number of seventeenth-century philosophers including Bayle and Locke. However, in section 10 Berkeley offers the inseparability argument. This presupposes anti-abstractionism, the lik

摻和

A Sceptical Interlude,c as a dogmatist to be faced with the following dilemma: either the sceptic is really saying something, in which case his very assertions force him to cease to be a sceptic, or he is not saying anything, in which case we need pay no attention to him. However, the arguments chronicled in the texts of

indignant

Mirage