Titlebook: Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy; Sally Frampton Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The

失望未來(lái)

Racing to a Renewable Transition?ical press. This chapter focuses on the period between the 1830s and 1850s, a time during which the operation to remove diseased ovaries was given the appellation ‘ovariotomy’, and when the debate as to the justifiability of the operation was at its most polarised. For an increasingly vocal group of

ETHER

William R. Thompson,Leila Zakhirovan of Thomas Spencer Wells’ ., in which the surgeon detailed all 114 ovariotomies he’d performed, dramatically improved the reputation of ovariotomists and signalled a major rebranding of the operation from dangerous novelty to a symbol of Victorian skill and industry. As the operation’s status ascen

按等級(jí)

Prognosis

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79496-5re. Instead it offers an exploration of the ‘a(chǎn)fterlife’ of ovariotomy, following the controversies that surrounded the operation towards the end of the century. By the 1890s, the term ‘ovariotomy’ had become increasingly uncertain in its meaning, as a range of other terms emerged to refer to new tec

彎曲道理

Armory

mydriatic

Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy

Libido

比喻好

周興旺