Titlebook: Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy; Sally Frampton Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The

生來

確認

Askar Akaev,Yuri Ichkitidze,Valentin Sokolove. The chapter argues that it was also the relative expendability of reproductive organs, in comparison with other ‘vital’ organs, which further focused attention upon them as a potential site of surgical intervention.

貪婪性

Feature

輕快走過

諷刺滑稽戲劇

模仿

Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018tury. Bold and daring, surgeons who performed it claimed to be initiating a new era of surgery by opening the abdomen. Ovariotomy soon occupied a complex position within medicine and society, as an operation which symbolised surgical progress, while also remaining at the boundaries of ethical accept

morale

誤傳

Pathologies, Actions, Ideas,o have a complex pathology, which made it an object of curiosity within the burgeoning field of morbid anatomy. Chaotic, deceptive and at times astonishing due to the enormous size they could attain, ovarian tumours were seen to defy both bodily order and medical control. These difficulties precipit

啟發(fā)

Creating a Surgical Controversy,ical press. This chapter focuses on the period between the 1830s and 1850s, a time during which the operation to remove diseased ovaries was given the appellation ‘ovariotomy’, and when the debate as to the justifiability of the operation was at its most polarised. For an increasingly vocal group of