Titlebook: Belief Change; Didier Dubois,Henri Prade Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998 artificial intelligence.intelligence.kin

CESS

抵制

Logics for Belief Base Updating,nd an update function .. The query . means that the database is asked whether it follows from the data contained in it that the light in question is on. The answer is basically ‘yes’ or ‘no’. (There might be more cooperative answers such as a variable substitution à . PROLOG.) In the simplest case .

生存環(huán)境

Belief Change Rules in Ordinal and Numerical Uncertainty Theories,ertainty theories are tailored to representing epistemic states involving shades of belief and are more expressive than classical logic in that respect. Indeed, considering a propositional belief set (a set of accepted beliefs) from the standpoint of uncertainty, a proposition is only surely true (i

condone

book provides a state-of-the-art picture of its formalfoundations. It deals with the addition, deletion and combination ofpieces of information and, more generally, with the revision, updatingand fusion of knowledge bases. The book offers an extensive coverageof, and seeks to reconcile, two traditi

干旱

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137340313 the research in this area is influenced by work in philosophical logic, in particular by G?rdenfors and his colleagues [.; .; .], who developed the .. Here we will focus on the computational aspects of this theory, surveying results that address the issue of the computational complexity of belief revision.

猜忌

小臼

創(chuàng)作

不利

Conditionals and the Ramsey Test, theory. As is well known, he and de Finetti—independently of each other—were the founders of the so-called subjectivist (or ‘personalist’) approach to probability. It should be mentioned that the first comprehensive monograph on the different aspects of Ramsey’s work has only recently been published [.].

Gudgeon

Logics for Belief Base Updating,n. The answer is basically ‘yes’ or ‘no’. (There might be more cooperative answers such as a variable substitution à . PROLOG.) In the simplest case . ollows from the database just if . explicitly appears in it, but in the case of more expressive systems such as logical databases the answering mechanism resorts to deduction.