Titlebook: Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray; Emma R. Jones Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Sp

FEIGN

亞當(dāng)心理陰影

初次登臺(tái)

Swayam Sampurna Panigrahi,Deepti Chandrathe other, the symbolic, the real, and the phallus help us understand how the issue of sexual difference is bound up with this world of shared meaning. In particular, Lacan seems to exclude women or the feminine from the symbolic and indicates that a positive relation between the sexes is impossible

CLOT

N. V. Subbarao,Bindu Chhabra,Manit Mishrae Jacques Lacan, language is an event that exceeds the human sphere. Further, I suggest that language, for Heidegger, is an event that calls upon humanity to attune itself to the structures that condition our existence and to formulate a response through speech. I show how Luce Irigaray inherits Hei

阻止

Resign

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09539-0upon different others in order to grow and establish its embodied place in the world. I analyze common features seen in cases of domestic violence, suggesting that they are at least in part a result of an underlying denial of woman’s place: a result of the underlying refusal of a relation to alterit

謊言

exuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings..?.This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, fem978-3-031-19307-1978-3-031-19305-7

conduct

Book 2023ially prominent in her later texts – is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings..?.This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, fem

未完成

Book 2023lies a problematically na?ve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis..By tracing the notion of .relation. throughout Irigaray’s work, this b

柔美流暢

itance illuminates how sexuate difference is ontological.IdeMany scholars have struggled with Irigaray’s focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is “ontological,” wondering if this implies a problematically na?ve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, t