找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Basic Income Reconsidered; Social Justice, Libe Simon Birnbaum Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2012 politic

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 調(diào)停
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:05:26 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:46:27 | 只看該作者
2662-3803 Overview: Basic income is one the most innovative, powerful and controversial proposals for addressing poverty and growing inequalities. This book examines the arguments for and against basic income from the point of view of economic and social justice.978-1-349-29562-3978-1-137-01542-6Series ISSN 2662-3803 Series E-ISSN 2662-3811
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:00:34 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:40:06 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53795-0 one accepts certain liberal-egalitarian starting points associated with the Rawlsian project. An unconditional set of universal social rights can be justified as a way of supporting a brute-luck-countering (maximin-guided, i.e., efficiency-sensitive) equalization of the freedom to do whatever one might want to do.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 20:43:11 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:43:53 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 04:32:04 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 08:40:36 | 只看該作者
Periodization of the Hepu Han Tombs,-egalitarian demands discussed in chapter 2. Philippe Van Parijs’s way of arriving at his radical conclusion that justice requires “the highest sustainable” basic income rests heavily on one interesting and controversial argument, namely, that the so-called employment rents, accessed through favorab
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 13:27:08 | 只看該作者
Zwischen Sprache und Information II,ngness to work, may be superior to the work-tested minimum income programs of traditional welfare states. As discussed in the last two chapters, Philippe Van Parijs’s powerful neutrality-based justification of basic income argues that a universal arrangement of that kind serves to equalize access to
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 19:22:32 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53795-0 one accepts certain liberal-egalitarian starting points associated with the Rawlsian project. An unconditional set of universal social rights can be justified as a way of supporting a brute-luck-countering (maximin-guided, i.e., efficiency-sensitive) equalization of the freedom to do whatever one m
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 23:28
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宾阳县| 邵武市| 樟树市| 翼城县| 阳西县| 抚顺县| 南昌市| 桂东县| 泉州市| 新竹县| 六盘水市| 巴中市| 舞钢市| 盐边县| 灵丘县| 乌拉特后旗| 新乡县| 巩留县| 高邮市| 涪陵区| 吴桥县| 宁德市| 江北区| 乌兰县| 左云县| 冀州市| 桐柏县| 五指山市| 乌兰察布市| 宁远县| 永州市| 钦州市| 尖扎县| 鹿泉市| 高邮市| 平和县| 临武县| 罗田县| 马山县| 罗田县| 商丘市|