Titlebook: Bank Mergers & Acquisitions; Yakov Amihud,Geoffrey Miller Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998 Acquisition.Bank.Bankin

歌唱隊

ESO

Bucket

寬度

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58995-9tudies on the topic including this one, what seems clear is that consolidation is not producing significant efficiencies — at least not on average. Other dimensions of the consolidation trend — such as its heavy concentration in large banks — are just as poorly understood. Given this ignorance as to

收養(yǎng)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-07920-0nchanged for acquired subsidiaries relative to non-acquired counterparts, specific earnings components improve. In particular, net interest margins widen, and premises expenses and salaries expenses are reduced in the post-merger period. However, these gains are offset by increases in other non-inte

GAVEL

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-7372-7 U.S. economy is increased competition.”. Motivating this paper is the sharp contrast between the high cost of bank mergers and acquisitions and the large number of such transactions. The existing legal rules and regulations that govern bank mergers and acquisitions make such transactions very costl

exercise

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66593-0try. After briefly reviewing the theory behind the risk-based capital rules, the paper observes that although the risk-based capital rules have not been generally binding on US banks, they soon may become binding as a result of market forces that are pressuring banks to take steps that result in low

收到

繁重

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2799-9Acquisition; Bank; Banking Industry; Finance; Investment; Mergers & Acquisitions; banking; financial market

Diskectomy