Titlebook: Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2022; Ivana Kunda,Zlatan Me?ki?,Du?an V. Popovi? Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

DUMMY

書目名稱Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2022影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2022影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2022網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2022網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2022被引頻次




書目名稱Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2022被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2022年度引用




書目名稱Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2022年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2022讀者反饋




書目名稱Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2022讀者反饋學科排名

濕潤

airborne

影響

2524-8715 s in European and international law across the Balkans.Explo.The fourth volume of the Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law (BYEIL) presents nine new articles offering scholarly insights into a variety of legal issues, with a special focus on the countries of Southeast Europe. All six ar

mucous-membrane

Book 2023ety of legal issues, with a special focus on the countries of Southeast Europe. All six articles in the special section reflect the authors’ efforts to untangle difficult questions concerning family property in private international law. Addressing a range of topics, leading national experts in the

FISC

Book 2023ternational law include three articles on diverse topics in private and public law, from a fresh take on the legal and practical effects of Brexit over EUTMs, and the legal nature of cryptocurrencies in different jurisdictions, to difficulties establishing the rule of law in Bosnia and Herzegovina..

PALMY

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41182-7ovisions of the 1979 Resolving Conflicts of Law and Jurisdiction in Status, Family and Inheritance Relations Act is discussed. As much as it provides for solutions to the interstate territorial conflict of laws, it also raises issues particular to the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

不透明性

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41182-7Croatian court, family formations, which are not covered by these instruments, are identified. The paper tries to untangle the complex interrelation of Croatian PIL provisions and other relevant EU private international law sources, in the attempt of delimiting which of these family formations’ property claims are left to Croatian PIL Act.

值得贊賞

存在主義