Titlebook: Balancing the Tension between Digital Technologies and Learning Sciences; Dirk Ifenthaler,Demetrios G. Sampson,Pedro Isaías Book 2021 The

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:59:30

書目名稱Balancing the Tension between Digital Technologies and Learning Sciences影響因子(影響力)

書目名稱Balancing the Tension between Digital Technologies and Learning Sciences影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名

書目名稱Balancing the Tension between Digital Technologies and Learning Sciences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度

書目名稱Balancing the Tension between Digital Technologies and Learning Sciences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名

書目名稱Balancing the Tension between Digital Technologies and Learning Sciences被引頻次

書目名稱Balancing the Tension between Digital Technologies and Learning Sciences被引頻次學(xué)科排名

書目名稱Balancing the Tension between Digital Technologies and Learning Sciences年度引用

書目名稱Balancing the Tension between Digital Technologies and Learning Sciences年度引用學(xué)科排名

書目名稱Balancing the Tension between Digital Technologies and Learning Sciences讀者反饋

書目名稱Balancing the Tension between Digital Technologies and Learning Sciences讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:35:25

Sunil Kumar Kammula,Veena Anand,Deepak Singhhess training, a significant difference emerged between the two groups in mathematical problem-solving ability, whether the two groups did not differ in their written text recall and comprehension ability. As for the general meta-cognitive abilities involved in learning, no significant differences e

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:52:17

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49099-6ics activities. In addition, the results clearly indicated that scaffolding was important for supporting children’s learning. The authors conclude with educational implications and future research directions.

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:06:57

E. Godefroy,E. Totel,M. Hurfin,F. Majorczykar that the employees spend 1–20?hours per month with self-education, while in the IT sector common employees dedicate more to self-education, executives dedicate more to self-education in the education system. When comparing the average values of the dimensions of a learning organization in relatio

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:44:35

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:40:34

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:48:30

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:30:02

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:00:12

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:10:01

		自動(dòng)登錄	找回密碼
密碼			To register

關(guān)于派博傳思			派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站			友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹	公司地理位置	論文服務(wù)流程	影響因子官網(wǎng)	吾愛論文網(wǎng)	大講堂	北京大學(xué)	Oxford Uni.	Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革	期刊點(diǎn)評(píng)	投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié)	SCIENCEGARD	IMPACTFACTOR	派博系數(shù)	清華大學(xué)	Yale Uni.	Stanford Uni.
\|Archiver\|手機(jī)版\|小黑屋\| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 06:41
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved