Titlebook: Axiological Pluralism; Jurisdiction, Law-Ma Lucia Busatta,Carlo Casonato Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under e

Limpid

樂章

Werner Buselmaier,Gholamali Tariverdian committees, clinical ethics committees, national ethics committees or ad hoc committees, I will focus my analysis on research ethics committees in biomedicine. I will examine their international legal framework in order to define them, identify their functions and analyse their possible instrumenta

NOMAD

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29479-1mension, international bioethics committees have provided guidance criteria to help focus and reasonably resolve ethical and legal issues beyond the limited scope at the state level, as well as governance related matters. This paper analyses the functions and competences of the most relevant committ

責(zé)怪

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74401-3rmination of pregnancy, the right to conscientious objection has frequently been depicted as an unjust and antidemocratic privilege for religious minorities or as part of an illiberal attack to women’s rights. This paper argues that, if properly regulated, conscientious objection is not only compati

可用

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74401-3y. CMEs are nowadays gaining growing attention, due to their ability to regulate important aspects of professional conduct, thus complementing the legal framework for various medical issues. The role of CMEs therefore offers a specific perspective from which to study the relationships between indivi

遺忘

啞巴

Cyril Astley Clarke M. D., Sc. D., F. R. S.requires to properly balance individual rights and freedoms with the need to set general public health rules. To this aim, the paper focuses on two paradigmatic issues, fiercely discussed during recent years both in Europe (in particular in Italy) and in the U.S.: non-validated therapies and vaccine

預(yù)兆好

Dominante und rezessive Vererbung,ed to be able to provide decision-making processes with objective and neutral points of view on the natural order. Nevertheless, several factors—such as the constant evolution of scientific research, scientific uncertainty, and social implications of scientific debates—make increasingly difficult to