Titlebook: Axiological Pluralism; Jurisdiction, Law-Ma Lucia Busatta,Carlo Casonato Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under e

Braggart

書目名稱Axiological Pluralism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Axiological Pluralism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Axiological Pluralism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Axiological Pluralism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Axiological Pluralism被引頻次




書目名稱Axiological Pluralism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Axiological Pluralism年度引用




書目名稱Axiological Pluralism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Axiological Pluralism讀者反饋




書目名稱Axiological Pluralism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

變色龍

BioLaw Facing Pluralisms: Three Simple Models for Complex Issuesetween different axiological orientations. These models highlight the various interactions between the legislature and the judiciary at the crossroads between the legal recognition of different moral values and the regulation of scientific development in medical sciences. The three models could be d

entreat

Some Patterns for “Scientific Adjudication”: The Role of Courts in Reconciling Axiological Pluralisms, commonly develop when facing scientifically complex issues. In the light of this, the impact of scientific complexity will be particularly weighted, particularly focussing on how the latter can influence the axiological assessment made by courts and how it shapes the entire attitude of courts, es

Mettle

遺傳

Fecundity

capillaries

Professional Medical Ethicsy. CMEs are nowadays gaining growing attention, due to their ability to regulate important aspects of professional conduct, thus complementing the legal framework for various medical issues. The role of CMEs therefore offers a specific perspective from which to study the relationships between indivi

Prologue

Axiological Pluralism: Conflict in the Hospital, Resolution in the Courtse handled? In particular, how are the risks arising from a perceived legitimacy deficit to be managed? This chapter outlines a number of possible responses to these questions and, then, with the focus on three recent appeals to the UK Supreme Court (namely, the decisions in ., ., and .), it offers s

duplicate

OPINE