Titlebook: Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology; William O‘Donohue,Akihiko Masuda,Scott Lilienfeld Textbook 2022 Springer N

厭惡

亞麻制品

Hypothesizing After Results Are Known: HARKingful scientific narratives that really engage audiences. Rather than seeing post-hoc findings as a pox on the study or investigator, as scholars and humans we should embrace the twists and turns our scholarship takes us, realizing that doing so is both more honest and more interesting.

白楊魚(yú)

Questionable Research Practices in Single-Case Experimental Designs: Examples and Possible Solutions in relation to the file drawer effect, publication bias, and meta-analyses of SCED research. We provide recommendations for researchers and the research community to promote practices for preventing QRPs in SCED.

conception

外來(lái)

Adversarial Collaborationy other open science innovations such as open materials and data sharing or study preregistration. Therefore, this chapter will begin by familiarising readers with adversarial collaboration, outlining some of its key features, and identifying potential benefits of the approach. The chapter ends with a discussion of what the approach can offer.

Mets552

shrill

chisel

高談闊論

Controversies Regarding Null Hypothesis Significance Testingllustrations, using both generated data and real data from meta-analyses in clinical psychology, of the more coherent findings that occur when NHST is ignored and when previous findings are taken into account when assessing a phenomenon across a series of studies.

FER