Titlebook: Autopoietic Knowledge Systems in Project-Based Companies; Kaj U. Koskinen Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers

floodgate

K. S. Rajesh,S. S. Dash,Ragam Rajagopal these components determine the interacting processes of autopoietic self-production. Their interactions maintain a project-based company’s functioning, learning, renewal, and co-evolution with its environment. However, although the components can be identified in project-based companies, there can

glucagon

FOIL

Green Buildings and Sustainable Engineeringrded as .. The control and autonomy approaches complement each other. A project-based company may be seen as an autonomous whole while simultaneously its projects may be seen as input-process-output systems from the control perspective (cf. Varela, 1979). This means that it is possible to regard a p

尖叫

Laxman Mishra,Abhijit Sinha,Rajat Guptamance. More than ever the success of project-based companies is governed by their abilities to manage knowledge assets that can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of project management. Therefore, project-based companies can be seen as knowledge-intensive units, which can be approached in term

無目標

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30841-4The literature of organizational knowledge reveals that companies can be regarded as knowledge-intensive systems (e.g. Newell et al., 2002). However, the . have not been well clarified in this literature. Therefore, an attempt to improve the knowledge-based theory of a company is necessary here (Spender, 1996a).

脆弱吧

Epistemological Assumptions,The literature of organizational knowledge reveals that companies can be regarded as knowledge-intensive systems (e.g. Newell et al., 2002). However, the . have not been well clarified in this literature. Therefore, an attempt to improve the knowledge-based theory of a company is necessary here (Spender, 1996a).

極小量

initiate

978-1-349-32639-6Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2010

潰爛

Green Buildings and Renewable Energyasis of a common ‘code’, that is, on the basis of the formal apparatus provided by systems theory (e.g. Bell and Morse, 1999). The systemic view gives primacy to the interrelationships, rather than to the elements of a system. It is from these dynamic interrelationships that new properties of the system emerge.

Introduction