Titlebook: Autocratization in post-Cold War Political Regimes; Andrea Cassani,Luca Tomini Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2

OAK

書(shū)目名稱Autocratization in post-Cold War Political Regimes影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Autocratization in post-Cold War Political Regimes影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Autocratization in post-Cold War Political Regimes網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Autocratization in post-Cold War Political Regimes網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Autocratization in post-Cold War Political Regimes被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Autocratization in post-Cold War Political Regimes被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Autocratization in post-Cold War Political Regimes年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Autocratization in post-Cold War Political Regimes年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Autocratization in post-Cold War Political Regimes讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Autocratization in post-Cold War Political Regimes讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Slit-Lamp

閃光你我

Expiration

Modes of post-Cold War Autocratization,that distinguishes five different modes of regime change towards autocracy—namely, military intervention, electoral process manipulation, political rights violation, civil liberties restriction, and horizontal accountability loosening—the authors highlight the multi-modal nature of the majority of c

Archipelago

Cases of post-Cold War Autocratization,r of this volume, the authors conduct case-study analysis on four representative recent episodes. These correspond to the transition from liberal democracy to defective democracy occurred in Ecuador in 2006; the transition from defective democracy to electoral autocracy that Moldova experienced in 2

嬉耍

Axon895

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03125-1autocratization; democratization; regime change; regime transitions; autocratization typology; autocratiz

Anticoagulant

Collected

Zusammenfassung der Untersuchung,t-Cold War period, the authors try to get a better understanding of this phenomenon, from both a conceptual and empirical viewpoint. This introductory chapter reviews the literature, and illustrates how the monograph is organized. The authors trace the recent renaissance of autocratization studies,

宿醉

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05236-2r processes of autocratization. They define autocratization as a process of regime change towards autocracy that makes the exercise of political power more arbitrary and repressive and that restricts the space for public contestation and political participation in the process of government selection