Titlebook: Australian Courts; Controversies, Chall Marg Camilleri,Alistair Harkness Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under e

Palatial

Juries in the Digital Age: Managing Juror Online and Social Media Use During Trial, enhance and pollute a criminal trial. This chapter advocates reforms to ensure jurors are kept engaged and active, are well informed through written collaborative jury directions, and deliberate more thoroughly without being tempted to seek their own digital advice.

公社

Affirm

Bail Decisions: Key Challenges Driving Bail Refusal, erosion of presumptions for bail, law and order approaches and increasingly complex tests for bail have been evident in the Australian criminal justice system in recent decades. This chapter explores key controversies and challenges for bail decision-makers, with particular attention to the experiences of homeless children.

inflate

Delaying Justice,ay is seen within only the narrow prism of efficiency, without a sophisticated understanding of the reasons and layers behind such delay, this can have implications on just decisions and confound the intended aims of the justice system.

違抗

高談闊論

Challenging Court Landscapes and Opportunities for Change,of law and to be open, transparent and subject to scrutiny. This chapter considers other challenges, too, which various courts and those who work in, with or appear before are facing. It assesses a suite of potential micro and macro reforms, advocating for ongoing systemic and structural change.

mastopexy

proach.Provides the first, comprehensive overview of the divThis edited collection brings together scholars and practitioners in every chapter to provide a comprehensive and unique exploration of courts in Australia. The primary focus is to identify controversies, challenges and change, in the form

側(cè)面左右

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03864-7parliamentary law reform committees, legal services boards, community legal centres and other bodies—in advocating for positive change, fairness and equity based on sound evidence rather than potentially knee-jerk reactions to public conjecture.

地殼

獨(dú)行者

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-31584-2ons people in Australia. It then explains how resistance to changing conventional sentencing considerations and practices have restricted the extent to which courts have been successful in shifting colonial power in sentencing.