找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations; Daniel D. Merrill Book 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990 Euclid.formal logic.history of

[復制鏈接]
查看: 27443|回復: 42
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:06:28 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations
影響因子2023Daniel D. Merrill
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/166/165574/165574.mp4
學科分類The New Synthese Historical Library
圖書封面Titlebook: Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations;  Daniel D. Merrill Book 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990 Euclid.formal logic.history of
影響因子The middle years of the nineteenth century saw two crucial develop- ments in the history of modern logic: George Boole‘s algebraic treat- ment of logic and Augustus De Morgan‘s formulation of the logic of relations. The former episode has been studied extensively; the latter, hardly at all. This is a pity, for the most central feature of modern logic may well be its ability to handle relational inferences. De Morgan was the first person to work out an extensive logic of relations, and the purpose of this book is to study this attempt in detail. Augustus De Morgan (1806-1871) was a British mathematician and logician who was Professor of Mathematics at the University of London (now, University College) from 1828 to 1866. A prolific but not highly original mathematician, De Morgan devoted much of his energies to the rather different field of logic. In his Formal Logic (1847) and a series of papers "On the Syllogism" (1846-1862), he attempted with great ingenuity to reformulate and extend the tradi- tional syllogism and to systematize modes of reasoning that lie outside its boundaries. Chief among these is the logic of relations. De Mor- gan‘s interest in relations culminated in his im
Pindex Book 1990
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations被引頻次




書目名稱Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations年度引用




書目名稱Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations讀者反饋




書目名稱Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:31:52 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:52:14 | 只看該作者
The Traditional Syllogism,ious point is De Morgan’s recognition of irreducibly relational inferences: without relational inferences that cannot be handled adequately by traditional logic, there would be little point in devising a new logic for that purpose. His other major claim concerns the very subject matter of logic. Tra
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:31:45 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:05:39 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:08:58 | 只看該作者
The Problem of Form and Matter,t significant review of these writings was written by Henry L. Mansel and published in 1851. It claimed that most of De Morgan’s innovations in . fall outside the domain of formal logic. The chief offender was the doctrine of the abstract copula, for it erred in both its analysis of judgment and its
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:27:41 | 只看該作者
The Logic of Relations, logic of relations. In this chapter, we will discuss De Morgan’s central contribution to the logic of relations, which he published in 1860 under the title, “On the Syllogism: IV and on the Logic of Relations.” In this classic memoir, De Morgan moves beyond his relational analysis of the syllogism
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:26:54 | 只看該作者
The New Synthese Historical Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/165574.jpg
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:26:21 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2047-7Euclid; formal logic; history of mathematics; logic; syllogism
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:32:49 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-16 23:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
孝感市| 论坛| 宁都县| 麻江县| 长丰县| 西贡区| 桂平市| 农安县| 马边| 遂溪县| 利津县| 岢岚县| 陇南市| 介休市| 五峰| 林芝县| 宝清县| 太和县| 彭州市| 镇巴县| 江阴市| 淄博市| 布尔津县| 平原县| 板桥市| 佛学| 墨玉县| 文成县| 北流市| 娄烦县| 云龙县| 恩施市| 灵川县| 古浪县| 庐江县| 汤原县| 察隅县| 天柱县| 永川市| 白河县| 马鞍山市|