Titlebook: Asylum Determination in Europe; Ethnographic Perspec Nick Gill,Anthony Good Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(

詼諧

What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Credibility? Refugee Appeals in Italygh which to observe how this notion is employed at the tribunals of Bologna and Turin, simultaneously as a core issue in the determination procedure, a sensitive category to handle with care, and an almost-empty shell used for purposes stretching out far beyond the tribunals themselves. Such purpose

SHOCK

Making the Right Decision: Justice in the Asylum Bureaucracy in Norwayrmine the accuracy of decisions. By comparing similar claims, decision-makers create local yardsticks of what a genuine refugee looks like. In this context, equal treatment to some extent comes to serve as a proxy for justice, in addition to creating a sense of certainty about the outcome. The uncer

Corporeal

背帶

Becoming a Decision-Maker, or: “Don’t Turn Your Heart into a Den of Thieves and Murderers”ndaries of asylum administrative decision-making. The asylum administration is conceptualised as a relatively autonomous field in which ongoing processes of boundary work take place. Amongst others, these revolve around caseworkers’ emotional involvement and their creativity in handling the ‘stuff’

軍火

Conclusionion making. In terms of contributions, the book highlights the messy, contingent, discretionary, unreliable, inconsistent and unjust processes through which legal doctrine is translated into bureaucratic practice in the context of large scale, international asylum decision making systems. In particu

樹上結(jié)蜜糖

Coronary-Spasm

Palgrave Socio-Legal Studieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/163729.jpg

Boycott

Asylum Determination in Europe978-3-319-94749-5Series ISSN 2947-9274 Series E-ISSN 2947-9282

calumniate

Traveling Salesman Problem: E-C-C Problembetween securitisation models emphasising control of refugees because of perceived risks they pose; and rights models focusing on asylum seekers as unique individuals. Approaches to asylum decision-making also reflect each country’s legal culture and political circumstances, generating anomalies bot

acolyte

Regulation Problem: E-O-C Problemhis so-called EU asylum acquis has resulted in a “Common European Asylum System (CEAS)”. The CEAS consists of rules to determine which Member State is responsible for determining an asylum claim; to define asylum seekers’ entitlements and obligations as regards their reception in Member States; to r