| 期刊全稱(chēng) | Assessing Well-Being | | 期刊簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng) | The Collected Works | | 影響因子2023 | Ed Diener | | 視頻video | http://file.papertrans.cn/164/163291/163291.mp4 | | 發(fā)行地址 | Present an introduction and in-depth discussion of the major scientific findings and theories of subjective well-being.Volume 1 presents broad reviews and theory articles that give readers the major f | | 學(xué)科分類(lèi) | Social Indicators Research Series | | 圖書(shū)封面 |  | | 影響因子 | The Sandvik, Diener, and Seidlitz (1993) paper is another that has received widespread attention because it documented the fact that self-report well-being scales correlate with a number of other methods of measuring the same concepts, such as with reports by knowledgeable “informants” (family and friends), expe- ence sampling measurement, and the memory for good versus bad life events. A single factor was found to underlie measures using different methods, and a n- ber of different well-being self-report measures were found to correlate with the non-self-report measures. Thus, although the self-report measures of well-being are imperfect, and can be in uenced by response artifacts, they have substantial validity as shown by their correlations with measurements based on alternative methods. Whereas the Pavot and Diener article reviewed the Satisfaction with Life Scale, the Lucas, Diener, and Larsen (2003) paper reviews various approaches to assessing positive emotions. As we wrote in the chapter in this volume in which we present new measures, we do not consider any of the existing measures of positive affect to be entirely acceptable for measuring subjective well-being in the affe | | Pindex | Book 2009 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋|
派博傳思國(guó)際
( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328)
GMT+8, 2026-1-23 22:58
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:51:46
