Titlebook: Arthritis of the Knee; Clinical Features an M. A. R. Freeman Book 1980 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1980 Kniegelenk.arthroplasty.biome

冷峻

The Surgical Anatomy and Pathology of the Arthritic Knee,llular level have been excluded, since at present they have little or no bearing upon the surgical treatment of these two conditions at the knee. (A partial exception to this statement is provided by the treatment of early RA by synovectomy and of early OA by osteotomy and re-alignment of the leg, topics dealt with in Chaps. 7 and 9).

Aura231

Clinical Assessment,ield has its own methods. As a consequence, results from different centres are not always easily compared, so that the relative merits of the different surgical procedures used in the treatment of the arthritic knee are almost impossible to assess.

growth-factor

Arthrodesis,ompression technique was the quickest of all the major orthopaedic operations to achieve its result. Bony fusion strong enough to permit unsupported weight-bearing could be achieved in a total period of 8 weeks and with a remarkably small failure rate.

Aspirin

牽連

背帶

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12252-2n them, and pain returned. The goal of pain relief with retention of the ligaments and as much bone as possible, to permit later arthrodesis if necessary, led to attempts to design surface-replacement components as typified by the work of ., ., ., ., and ..

CLOUT

埋伏

Radiological Examination of the Knee Joint and Other Special Investigations,In the past the orthopaedic surgeon has often relied upon small antero-posterior and lateral radiographs for the planning and control of treatment in rheumatoid and in degenerative arthritis of the knee (Fig. 1). These are not adequate. A full range of pictures showing the three parts of the joint is required for proper diagnosis and assessment.

突襲

肥料

Diverse People in Special Places,e, simple operative procedure, which results in a stable pain-free outcome. This is achieved at the expense of movement and occasionally of social acceptability. In proposing arthroplasty one must be confident that the advantages of arthrodesis will be retained, with the added bonus of a functional arc of movement.