Titlebook: Aristotle and The Philosophy of Law: Theory, Practice and Justice; Liesbeth Huppes-Cluysenaer,Nuno M.M.S. Coelho Book 2013 Springer Scienc

無力更進(jìn)

時(shí)代錯(cuò)誤

,Law and the Rule of Law and Its Place Relative to , in Aristotle’s Politics,the original teaching of Aristotle’s text and not that of the received interpretations that so powerfully shape our understanding of the question of law in the Politics. It will attempt to show that the fundamental teaching of Aristotle’s political science is the supremacy of the role of the politei

delta-waves

Anecdote

Controversy and Practical Reason in Aristotle,to understand the dialogical structure assumed by practical reason..We follow two lines of argumentation..From the reconstruction of Aristotle’s cultural background – Athens shackled by the antilogical perspective that was disseminated among sophists and sceptical thinkers in the fifth and fourth ce

reptile

Aristotelian Ethics and Aristotelian Rhetoric, of what rhetoric is as well as a variety of notions of what rhetoric should be. The paper shows that in the work of Aristotle rhetoric and ethics are inextricably connected. Aristotle’s limitation of rhetorical activity to three domains, his description of rhetoric as an offshoot from politics, his

酷熱

Consequence

PANT

Justice , and Justice as , (Legality and Equity),s it involves a self-contained dimension, in which it reproduces elementary jurisprudential principles. This paper is in search of principles by which legal practice is able to confront and repudiate the tacit normative power of factual perceptions and empirical knowledge depicted by Michel Foucault

元音

打算

Legal Rules and , in Aristotle: Post-positivism Rediscovered,e law. The author’s claim is that the Aristotelian concept of equity provides us with arguments to possibly overcome the dilemma between positivist conceptions of the law, on the one side, and antipositivist or non-positivist conceptions of the law, on the other. For this purpose, after (a) discussi