Titlebook: Argumentative Indicators in Discourse; A Pragma-Dialectical Frans H. Eemeren,Peter Houtlosser,A. Francisca Sno Book 2007 Springer Science+B

white-matter

W. Ehrenstein,W. Müller-Limmrothin my opinion’, ‘to my mind’, ‘the way I see it’ or ‘thus’ or ‘therefore’ may, for example, introduce a standpoint, and the use of ‘because’ or ‘given that’ argumentation. We call words and expressions that may refer to argumentative moves such as putting forward a standpoint or argumentation .. The

一起平行

Experimentation with Other Substances,ated that is aimed at resolving a difference of opinion on the merits (van Eemeren & Grootendorst 1984, 2004). This model specifies the dialectical stages that have to be distinguished in resolving a difference of opinion, as well as the verbal moves that serve a constructive purpose in the differen

aesthetic

disciplined

Euthyroid

Partnership Dissolution Mechanisms,ablishment of the material (or substantial) starting points for the discussion. As early as in classical dialectics these starting points played a crucial part, since a dialectic was interpreted as a critical dialogue in which one party, the opponent, tries to refute the standpoint of the other part

樂器演奏者

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25041-5or (in the case of coordination) the applied arguments and the standpoint at issue. A central question when evaluating an argumentative discussion or text is whether the argument schemes that the defender of a particular standpoint uses are in fact appropriate and correctly applied. The pragma-diale

侵略主義

Interpretation, Analysis and Discussion,ist of a particular standpoint receives or expects criticism about one or more elements of his argumentation, he will have to bring forward more arguments to meet this criticism. Depending on the nature of the criticism and the manner in which the protagonist tries to defend himself against it, the

falsehood

寬宏大量

Foreknowledge