Titlebook: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems; Third International Nicolas Maudet,Simon Parsons,Iyad Rahwan Conference proceedings 2007 Springer-Ve

做作

Dappled

MAL

Guillaume Morel,Philippe Bidaudquisition induced by rebut. They are derived from two distinctive and advantageous apparatuses of our approach to multi-valued argumentation under : Paraconsistency and multiple-valuedness that EALP and LMA feature. We describe an overall argument example to show the effectiveness and usefulness of

NEG

Towards a new Robot Generation,ind of decision consists of selecting among different alternatives (eg. different offers), the best one that, according to some . of the agent, will satisfy the . of the agent. The paper proposes then a formal model based on argumentation for computing on the basis of the above kinds of mental state

OWL

exacerbate

An Argumentation-Based Approach for Dialog Move Selectionind of decision consists of selecting among different alternatives (eg. different offers), the best one that, according to some . of the agent, will satisfy the . of the agent. The paper proposes then a formal model based on argumentation for computing on the basis of the above kinds of mental state

SNEER

0302-9743 the AAMAS 2006 main conference, as well as from ECAI 2006, the biennial European Conference on Artificial Intelligence..978-3-540-75525-8978-3-540-75526-5Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349

Lacunar-Stroke

A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Argutacks. In this paper we propose a generalization of the framework of Dung, which allows for sets of arguments to attack other arguments. We extend the semantics associated with the original framework to this generalization, and prove that all results in the paper by Dung have an equivalent in this more abstract framework.

較早

Carlo Tomasi,John Zhang,David Redkeytacks. In this paper we propose a generalization of the framework of Dung, which allows for sets of arguments to attack other arguments. We extend the semantics associated with the original framework to this generalization, and prove that all results in the paper by Dung have an equivalent in this more abstract framework.

惹人反感

0302-9743 e a solid contribution to the practice of multiagent dialogues. Application domains include: legal disputes, business negotiation, labor disputes, team formation, scientific inquiry, deliberative democracy, ontology reconciliation, risk analysis, scheduling, and logistics...This book constitutes the